![](https://batcoinz.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Screen-Shot-2024-11-19-at-2.17.17-PM-1024x906.png)

The English word “measure” comes from the Sanskrit word “maya”. Maya refers to illusion, but also the measurable world. Bitcoin is perhaps the most important freedom technology in Maya, but it is still therefore part of the matrix, the world of things, of the measurable. While we talk of “escaping the matrix” in Bitcoin, and this is true that a relative escape is achieved by learning about how a fiat monetary system inhibits freedom across a range of measures, these are not the highest freedoms, because they are still relative freedoms within Maya,

To put it another way, Bitcoin can give many freedoms. And …the highest freedoms, Bitcoin cannot give you.

No asset or technology can.

You can have all the self-custodied Bitcoin, but …

If your mind continually moves from past events, to future plans, and you are unable to have it stay anchored in the present, then you are not free.

If you get triggered, and your emotions are decided by the words of others, then you are not free.

If you get irate and frustrated whenever someone criticises bitcoin then you are not free.

If you have many unrealised desires and ambitions that you believe you need to be fulfilled before you can be content, then you are not free.

If your mind gets unsettled when events do not go the way you want without delays or imperfections etc, then you are not free.

If while maintaining money, you fear losing it in the future, then you are not free.

If you feel fear when you lose some money or resources from your life, then you are not free.

If after realising one financial goal you feel compelled to quickly set a bigger one, then you are not free.

Bitcoin contributes to freedom. But it doesn’t cause freedom Freedom over your own mind is the ultimate self-sovereignty.


It’s not every day you hear about someone taking four round-trip flights from Dublin to Prague to buy…

It’s not every day you hear about someone taking four round-trip flights from Dublin to Prague to buy bitcoin.

Or a barber at a bitcoin castle meetup charging sats for a haircut. Or someone holding up a frozen octopus bought through a bitcoin app.

But these stories aren’t urban legends; they’re real and they’re happening through [Vexl](https://x.com/vexl), a nonprofit, privacy-first peer-to-peer trading platform.

To understand what makes Vexl different, Lightning News sat down with Vexl’s Head of Growth [Grafton](https://x.com/satsdisco?t=m586s5CCzp7JhfvC3-57_A&s=09); who shared the mission, stories, and vision behind the platform that’s quietly building circular bitcoin economies worldwide.

*   **And we began with a simple but important question: what is Vexl, and how does it stand out from other peer-to-peer trading platforms?**

_[Vexl](https://vexl.it/) is a nonprofit app that lets people buy and sell bitcoin privately with friends and friends of friends. No KYC, no middlemen, no data collection._

_What makes it different is the way it works: instead of relying on reputation scores or anonymous strangers, Vexl connects you through your web of trust or your (social graph)._

_That means you see offers from people you’re already connected to directly or through mutual contacts, which makes trading more natural, safer, and closer to how cash works in the real world._

*   **Vexl emphasizes privacy and the concept of building a “web of trust.” Could you explain why these principles are so important to the platform’s vision?**

_Bitcoin was built to be peer-to-peer cash, not a product for financial institutions. Privacy matters because money without privacy is surveillance._

_Trust matters because trading with people in your circle is how real economies grow, and that is what we have truly seen._

_I only trade with people that I am direct friends with or have mutual contacts with._

_This gives me peace of mind that I know the trade is going to go smoothly. We believe this is closer to the spirit of bitcoin than any regulated exchange could ever be._

**Memorable Stories**
---------------------

*   **We’ve heard there are some incredible stories connected to Vexl, involving horses, fish, an octopus, and even a donkey. Could you share one or two of the most remarkable experiences from the platform?**

_I mean, this is the most fascinating part of the app. Originally, we planned for it to be just for buying and trading bitcoin._

_However, we soon discovered that people wanted more. They wanted to grow local circular economies, to trade things other than bitcoin, and to earn bitcoin along the way._

_I think in the first week after the marketplace went live, we started to see offers for things like raw milk and honey, and it just grew from there until we eventually added a dedicated marketplace feature for products and services._

_You can see this now in the app — you open it and choose: I have a product and I want bitcoin, or I have bitcoin and I want a product._

_For me, one of the most remarkable stories I’ve ever heard and personally experienced was when I met a taxi driver in Dublin, Ireland._

_He told me he’d been saving his cash tips for years under his mattress and wanted a way to buy bitcoin without having to KYC on an exchange._

_As a foreigner living in Ireland, he couldn’t purchase from exchanges anyway. We swapped contacts, and he quickly found one of my friends who was willing to sell him bitcoin._

_But because he didn’t have much of a network in Ireland yet, he actually made several trips to Prague to meet one of my friends and buy bitcoin in person._

_To me, this is one of the most amazing stories because it shows how much bitcoin means to some people, and what they’re willing to do to acquire it without permission or KYC._

_I met him for coffee while he was in Prague, because I was blown away by his story. He showed me a photo of his family with his wife and three children. In the photo, his wife was holding a pregnancy test, and he said: “This is why I did it — not for me, but for them.”_

_I mean, imagine that: taking four round-trip flights from Dublin to Prague just to buy bitcoin without KYC._

_Most peer-to-peer apps require you to trade with strangers using a bank account or something that connects to your real name. But on Vexl, you always trade with people you can trust._

_For me, I knew he was a trustworthy guy, and now I always have a great taxi driver in Dublin when visiting. We remain in contact and speak often, and I would even consider him a good friend now._

![image](https://lightning.news/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/image-1024x607.jpeg "The Octopus Purchase: How Vexl Redefines Peer-to-Peer Bitcoin Trading 1")

Screenshot

*   **What’s the most unexpected or creative trade you’ve seen happen through Vexl?**

_I mean, I’ve seen a lot over the years now, but I mean, things like plumbing and heating services stick out because that is like what I want._

_I don’t want to look on the Internet for a plumber who has Google reviews and try to determine what’s real and what’s fake reviews._

_If I need one or an air conditioner repairman, I would love to be able to find one through friends and friends of friends._

_I mean, that’s basically what we do anyway, we’re all familiar with that right? I mean, we meet somebody and we share our experiences, and then we want our friends to have a good time._

_So I think one that surprised me most is recently, I was looking for a physiotherapist and had a difficult time finding one, much to my surprise, but one day I opened (vexl), and there it was low and behold, a physiotherapist offering their services on Vexl for Bitcoin and we had quite a few mutual friends._

_These are the kind of stories that I think are truly amazing. It shows people understand what is possible with (vexl) and are interested in building something different and better than what we currently have, which is gamified ratings systems full of stars and empty trust. I want a world where I am always getting quality trades with people I can trust._

*   **How do these unique trades reflect the culture of peer-to-peer bitcoin transactions?**

_Well, as bitcoiners, we believe in value for value, and I think that’s what Vexl allows us to do. When I connect with people who are connected with me through mutual friends, it’s kind of like having my little support network of people who have skills and services and who trade something that we all value with each other._

_Take Hairtoshi, for example. Recently, I was at a Bitcoin event in Germany, and fiat currency was banned for three days. The only thing that you could spend was Bitcoin._

_I got a haircut with Bitcoin, and this is absolutely part of our culture. It was one of the best haircuts I’ve ever had in my life, and I’m not joking, and what it made me realize is that this is exactly the world that I wanna live in._

_I struggle to find a good barber, and I’ve been to many, many different ones over the years, but I found the best barber at a Bitcoin event in the middle of nowhere, at an old historic castle._

_I paid 21,000 satoshi for a haircut, and I walked away satisfied. I think that this is what we all want to experience, and we all experience our whole life when asking our friends for advice._

_Well imagine not having to ask every time, you just pull up on Vexl and you see a network of people and their skills and services that are in your network and you can see how many mutual friends you have and you can vouch for each other and create a true circular economy that’s based on real experiences and trust with people that you know, but it’s all done in a way that’s private and not annoying._

_No one gets messages when you join Vexl. It’s truly a purely peer-to-peer economy that we can create with this. And by the way, if you want to follow the barber I’m talking about, his X account is_ [**_@Hairtoshi\_2_**](https://x.com/Hairtoshi_21)

**The Octopus Purchase**
------------------------

*   **There’s a fascinating example of someone buying an octopus using bitcoin through Vexl. Can you tell us the full story behind that trade?**

_I mean, this was a wild one. So I’m browsing Vexl, and I see the offer for frozen octopus. Someone, I guess, had been fishing in Croatia or somewhere else, and I couldn’t believe it was frozen octopus for sale on Vexl…. why? It had to be a joke, right???_

_But it wasn’t because a few days later, I saw a guy on Twitter holding the octopus up in his hands and saying look what I bought on Vexl._

> Tak dobrú chuť! ![😎](https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f60e.png) Máte rádi tyto potvory? ![🤔](https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f914.png) A víte, že idú kúpit na [@vexlu](https://twitter.com/vexlu?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) za bitcointy? ![😊](https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/72x72/1f60a.png) [pic.twitter.com/pv5eDbt3BI](https://t.co/pv5eDbt3BI)
>
> — DědaBitcoiner (@dedabitcoiner) [June 7, 2024](https://twitter.com/dedabitcoiner/status/1799051354100682988?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

_I think we were all shocked that something like that was possible, and this is what happens. It never ceases to amaze me that people take tools and build things with them, and that’s exactly what Vexl is._

_It’s a tool. It’s an open source tool, so if someone takes Vexl even further and builds something better than we always think, mission accomplished._

_We’re not a business trying to make money; we’re a foundation trying to create tools that empower the individual with the freedom to transact, and that is what people are doing. Here is a link to the tweet:_ [_https://x.com/dedabitcoiner/status/1799051354100682988_](https://x.com/dedabitcoiner/status/1799051354100682988)_._

*   **How did the community respond to this kind of transaction, and what does it say about the possibilities that Vexl enables?**

_Well, you know your network is your net worth, so you’ll never see so


e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e


e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e

e


Bitcoin Magazine Freedom of Mind and Freedom of Money: Inside Costa Rica’s Growing Bitcoin Circular Economy The embryo of each Bitcoin Circular Economy is unique. The purposes of Bitcoin Circular Economies are diverse and, as they grow, the projects develop their own identity: education, P2P, payments, wallets etc. The quests of their protagonists often shape the origin of each, with characteristics and needs that define them. The founders, who decide to pursue this social, technological and economic adventure, define the spirit of the project. The Bitcoin Jungle project was born in the heart of the Costa Rican jungle, where a vibrant community of expatriates and digital nomads from all over the world is trying to develop a more conscious way of living in harmony with nature. Two men lit the spark that gave birth to Bitcoin Jungle. Over time, others joined the fire, but two were the energies that aligned to start this project. One a developer and serial entrepreneur; the other a journalist, retired teacher and democracy activist. Both shared two deeply rooted beliefs in their hearts. First, Costa Rica is the best place in the world to live. Second, Bitcoin is an enlightening technology that can lead humanity to a more peaceful and evolved lifestyle. Richard Scotford lived in Hong Kong for more than 20 years. He worked as a teacher and freelance reporter for various media outlets, always as a political analyst. Richard witnessed firsthand the peaceful protests that began there in 2014 with the “Umbrella Movement,” which later became a symbol of resistance. Without mincing words, Richard supported Hong Kong’s democratic struggle against the Chinese Communist Party, which imposed an election system where the people could only choose among candidates selected by the party. Through his articles, Richard became part of Hong Kong’s political scene, and when his friends and colleagues began to be imprisoned, he decided it was time to take a new direction in life. At the time, Richard knew nothing about Bitcoin and admits that he crossed off the list of all the mistakes that cryptocurrency users usually make before coming into Bitcoin. “We were scammed, we lost money until mid-2018 when we started to understand the differences between Bitcoin and the other cryptocurrencies.” The realization about Bitcoin and the profound impact it could have on the world came at a very special time in the lives of Richard and his wife. “We were in the middle-class trap, where we had everything we needed. All we could do was have more or better stuff. A better car, a fancier boat, a bigger house or join a better club. I call it a trap because there was nothing extra to own. It was clear that our happiness was not going to change by having more or better things. We wanted to do something radically different and that’s how we ended up in Costa Rica.” At first, the couple explored the diverse climates and landscapes of the country. They found many similarities with the jungles of Hong Kong, enjoyed the volcanic beaches of the Pacific Ocean as well as those of the Caribbean. It was not easy to impress the new visitors, who knew the Asian beaches by heart. It wasn’t until Christmas 2019 when Richard would find a new meaning to his purpose in Costa Rica. “We participated in an ayahuasca ceremony in the jungle. Suddenly, three different ideas connected in my mind. On the one hand, I felt a call to dive deep into jungle medicine, which is central to Costa Rican culture. On the other hand, all the ideas I had about Bitcoin connected. At the time, I was precisely falling down the rabbit hole, studying and learning as much as possible.” “It all connected with conversations about the best way to school our daughter.” “It all came together: I was a teacher in Hong Kong, so naturally it came up for me to get involved with a local elementary school. Then the idea of building our own secondary school in 2020 would come up.” Before long, the dream of opening his own school came to life. “I told my wife: ‘We are going to create the first school in Costa Rica that accepts bitcoin. And we’re going to teach their kids and our kids about Bitcoin.’ The only thing I could think of was to send out a tweet to the Bitcoin community that said, ‘We are a school in Costa Rica, we want to accept Bitcoin. How can we do it?’” Many people responded to Richard’s request for help, including Nicholas Burtey, co-founder of Galoy and the Bitcoin Beach wallet, currently called Blink. Nicholas suggested that the best way to start accepting small payments was through a Bitcoin Lightning wallet and offered to help. He encouraged them to create a fork of their own wallet, based on the open source repository of the Bitcoin Beach wallet. That was the first moment Richard realized he wasn’t alone. “That’s where things started to take shape. We wanted to develop our own wallet to simplify payments at school, and at the same time also facilitate Bitcoin adoption in Uvita, the town we chose to live in. The problem was that we didn’t have the technical skills needed to fork the Galoy repository and build it.” The universe manages to cross the paths of people who need each other. Just when Richard was stymied by his lack of technical skills to launch a local version of the wallet tailored to Uvita’s needs, he met Lee Salminen, a software engineer and serial entrepreneur from Boulder, Colorado. Lee is a cheerful, positive person who sees opportunity in every challenge. The combination of his technical skills, his passion for Bitcoin and his purpose in life made him the perfect candidate to start a Bitcoin Circular Economy. Richard and Lee fit together like pieces of a puzzle.” “Lee is another core founder of Bitcoin Jungle. He was able to bring the project to life. He copied Galoy’s wallet over a weekend, without any support. Even the guys at Galoy couldn’t believe we had done it so fast,” Richard recalls. “Bitcoin is a tool to change the world, to raise the awareness of humanity.” Just at that time, the first edition of the Adopting Bitcoin conference was taking place in El Salvador. Richard traveled to the neighboring country, while Lee stayed in Costa Rica working on the wallet. “Going on that trip to El Salvador was eye-opening. No one knew who I was. Just a simple English guy walking down the halls, trying to make friends, saying, ‘Hi, we want to do something like Bitcoin Beach in Costa Rica — can you help us?'” The Sats Were Already in This Circular Economy Seen from the outside, Bitcoin Jungle’s approach seemed impossible. Copying the source code of a wallet over a weekend, without technical support from the original developers, was a huge challenge. Then launching an adoption campaign without a significant amount of sats to donate and start the process. However, Richard knew that a Bitcoin Circular Economy in Costa Rica had potential for one simple reason. “The sats were already there! I knew Costa Rica was different. There were a lot of people around me who owned bitcoin. It was full of expats. All we needed was to create the payment rails to get them moving. The money was already here, we just needed places to spend it.” Richard doesn’t beat around the bush and gets straight to the point because he feels he has a message to share: “You have to know your community. Understand and provide the services they need. It’s important to learn from other circular economies, but many times the keys to success are in the differences.” When Richard returned from El Salvador, Lee already had his wallet working. The excitement within the volcanoes of the Costa Rican jungle was beginning to stir the first tremors. The Circular Economy Plan: Start Small From the beginning, the founders of Bitcoin Jungle decided to keep the efforts concentrated in a relatively small area called The Golden Triangle, demarcated by the towns of Dominical, Uvita and Tinamaste. Instead of spreading the efforts throughout the country, they decided to focus on this particular region, characterized by spiritual seekers, surfers and people with a deep connection to nature. “Although Bitcoin Jungle is spilling all over Costa Rica, in the beginning we had no plans to go out massively and try to adopt the whole country. It has always been about keeping it small, local, within our personal connections. The area between Dominical, Uvita and Tinamaste has a lot of healers, natural medicine practitioners and alternative people. It has this unique energy that is hard to explain, but easy to feel. It is a very large area, full of foreigners, who receive income from their countries and need to spend it in Costa Rica.” Govinda wears yoga attire and whispers in a calm voice, which conveys the vibe of much of this community of foreigners who chose Costa Rica as their new home. Govinda is another key member of Bitcoin Jungle: He runs the holistic center Awake, a sustainable hotel with activities related to yoga and meditation. Awake is also the place where many Bitcoin meetings are held, as well as training sessions on the Bitcoin Jungle wallet. This center is also the location where the Nostrica conference was held in 2023. This unique community has adopted Bitcoin as another tool to seek the elevation of human consciousness and harmony with nature. In pursuit of contributing to this balance, gaining trust within the community was key to integrating this innovative technology into their daily lives. “It was key to the success of the project to have founders like Lee and Richard,” Govinda explains. “When the project started, there were several cryptocurrency scams going around and they were able to explain in Spanish to the store owners the differences with Bitcoin, as well as the technical aspects of the wallet in very simple terms. They were key to developing confidence in the project and the team of people behind it.” Being scarce, digital and transparent, bitcoin begins to demonstrate its advantages, solving problems for multiple types of people. It is worth looking at the profile of the main users of Bitcoin Jungle. They face a different problem than the exiled families in El Salvador who send remittances back home. It is true that both projects coincide in the way they defined their target influence area, seeking to concentrate the amount of Bitcoin payments per store, nurture their user experience and economic revenues, with the aim of maintaining a stable relationship between the number of visitors and the length of the store network. However, the Golden Triangle population had something in common that other Bitcoin Circular Economies did not. As Richard likes to say, “Most of the people in the Bitcoin Jungle community have already done the work.” He refers to the fact that many of the people in Uvita and Dominical already understood how to hold virtual currencies and many even used bitcoin as a store of value. The team just needed to give them a direct payment system to ignite the virtuous circular cycle. Instead of paying with high-fee credit cards and constantly needing to transfer money into the country from abroad, users could simply load their Bitcoin Lightning wallet and buy whatever they needed. “Our main goal was pretty simple, we were focused on reducing the friction of using bitcoin for people visiting and living in Costa Rica,” Richard expounds the conclusion he came to some time after processing the purpose that had distilled his spiritual journey. All that remained was to design an adoption strategy and encourage Bitcoiner tourism. Bitcoin Circular Economies are New Social Contracts Costa Rica is known worldwide for its paradisiacal beaches, misty jungles, exotic animals, volcanoes and surfing. It tends to be a very attractive spot for tourism in the Central American corridor. Add its political stability, its high security standards, its motto “Pura vida” (pure life), as a declaration of respect for nature and the abolition of its army. The result not only caught the attention of tourism within the ecosystem, but also of the community of digital nomads, who began to take it as one of their permanent residencies. The community continues to expand, with a growing percentage of visitors and families who decide to settle. Most are foreigners from the United States, Canada and Europe, some seeking to escape excessive surveillance and increasing government oppression. “Many came here looking for a new social contract, one that works for everyone and is not imposed from a top-down approach,” Govinda stresses before pausing, taking a breath, and clarifying the unwritten but community-adopted manifesto. “We believe in freedom, peace and prosperity, which are values that are deeply aligned with Bitcoin. We don’t want to be told what to do. This is why I have high hopes for the rapid growth of the Bitcoin Jungle community.” However, the first years of these projects, which grow into a Bitcoin Circular Economy, are not easy. Founders often delimit the boundaries. There are multiple ways to get involved in the Bitcoin ecosystem and, given the characteristics of the Costa Rican community, different models were discussed in the early days. Having a large community of tech-savvy expats, with bitcoin available to spend, represents either a temptation or an opportunity — depending on your point of view — to develop a profitable business. One of the early contributors to the project was interested in pursuing this line, while the other founders wanted to build a nonprofit community endeavor. “There was an interesting situation at the beginning, because one of the early founders tried to turn it into a commercial project and make money from it. All the other founding members were more interested in it remaining a community-driven thing. This led to a very healthy split around 2021 and what is now known globally as Bitcoin Jungle is the nonprofit project that we decided to continue,” Govinda clarifies, inviting reflection with raised eyebrows. There are multiple Bitcoin businesses around the world that follow conscious efforts of social responsibility. However, there is a reason why Bitcoin Circular Economies are deeply rooted as nonprofit community projects. Govinda converses while touching the air with his hands. The more he shares his thoughts, the closer he comes to the image of a shaman who can observe the inner self of people who cross his path. “People can sense it. The energy is completely different if there is someone behind it who wants to make profit or if it comes from a sincere and genuine interest in the good of people and humanity. These subtle energies create projects with a very different spirit. We were not doing this for the money.” Govinda speaks confidently of ideals. When the goal is to prove that a new social contract is possible, the words do not waver. “We believe in Bitcoin and we believe in Costa Rica. We want it to be a union between technology and nature to raise the level of consciousness. We are ready to dedicate some of our time and energy to make this happen as a gift to our community and the world.” “Bitcoin aims to change power dynamics of money, to break free from abusive forces that enslave us, and to reclaim our sovereignty to choose freely.” Nostr in the Bitcoin Jungle Bitcoin Jungle was able to build its own identity. Another unique feature of this Bitcoin Circular Economy is its link with Nostr, the open source communications protocol that’s ideal for developing decentralized social networks. These platforms can easily integrate with the Bitcoin Lightning Network and implement micro-donations, called “zaps,” for content creators. Given its unrestricted access design and resistance to censorship, Nostr is ideal for promoting freedom of expression in the face of social control and government censorship. Jack Dorsey, the original founder of Twitter, has been living in Costa Rica for a long time and has been closely following and supporting the growth of Bitcoin Jungle. He is one of the big promoters of Nostr, has funded several projects in the ecosystem and was instrumental in creating the first international conference on this technology. “Jack was one of the first people to follow our Twitter account, but we had no personal contact. One day, he tweeted that a Nostr conference should be organized in Costa Rica and that he was willing to fund it if the community organized it.” Pride covers Richard’s face as he describes the backstage of Nostrica, the event they organized together. After all, Richard had experienced first-hand the social control during his years in Hong Kong. “We all loved the idea because decentralized social networks are very much needed today. So we reached out to him and offered our entire infrastructure and business ecosystem to simplify payments for attendees.” The combination of the world’s first Nostr conference with the possibility of powering the Bitcoin Jungle circular economy seemed like a perfect match. Jack Dorsey gave the green light. The Nostr protocol has multiple philosophical similarities with Bitcoin and, consequently, there is significant overlap between their communities. Govinda, as expected, holds space for individual freedoms alongside its inner peace. “This new communications protocol has the potential to enable social networking with complete freedom of expression — we could build a decentralized Twitter or Facebook! We can talk and share ideas or images without surveillance. It’s cryptographic and decentralized, like Bitcoin.” Since its creation by anonymous user @fiatjaf in 2020, the Nostr protocol has seen a rapid increase in usage driven primarily by the Bitcoin community. The team insisted to Jack that the event be held in Uvita to leverage and stimulate the Bitcoin circular economy. As it happened, the Nostrica conference was a success. With over 50 speakers and 300 participants, it significantly increased international awareness of Bitcoin Jungle. “It really put us on the map as a destination for many Bitcoiners,” Richard recalls. “We already had one of the best user experiences for spending sats and enjoying Bitcoin, but many of them still hadn’t heard of us before the event.” The circular economy that Nostr has its strongest relationship with today is Bitcoin Jungle, and that has had many good consequences. Not only did it increase the endogenous tourism of the ecosystem, the unexpected success of the conference also generated the first economic gain for Bitcoin Jungle. “Up until this event, everything has been self-funded. The devices we deliver to the stores, the cost to support the users, the training, the node on which the wallet runs, and so on. We don’t charge anyone, not on transactions within the node, everything is completely free,” Richard humbly shares. “Going forward, we plan to continue doing festivals every year to further advance our community mission, so everyone is invited to the Freedom Festival in February 2025!” The Spiritual Connection: Why Bitcoin and Costa Rica Were Made For Each Other Costa Rica is a very special place. Many people who dream of making a positive contribution to the world, for some reason, are attracted to this country. The connection between these international spiritual seekers and Costa Rica has created a unique community in the world, combining innovation, yoga, nature, ayahuasca and technology. In retrospect, it is understandable why this environment became fertile ground for the birth for perhaps the most important Bitcoin Circular Economy in the world. This transcendental aspect is present in the minds and hearts of those who make Bitcoin Jungle. Richard, who used to be a reporter clinging to the truth and transparency of democracy, continues to go through a personal transformation, though without losing his essence. “I would say my main goal is the spiritual elevation of consciousness about Bitcoin. I think Bitcoin is a fundamental part of this new world we are trying to build, that’s why we created Bitcoin Jungle. It’s our contribution to a more conscious and free future for humanity.” Those who are deeply connected to Gaia tend to perceive the cyclical nature of all processes in our universe. Human evolution has also been shown to follow recurring patterns. Many Bitcoiners have been pointing out for over a decade that we may be on the verge of a major paradigm shift. This sense of hope is palpable throughout the Bitcoin Jungle community. There is a deep shared belief there that after the inevitable collapse of fiat currencies under the weight of their own debt, there will be a new beginning. “There is a large community of international seekers here. They believe in freedom, peace and prosperity. Values that are deeply aligned with Bitcoin’s culture. They understand how money printing and inflation create poverty and inequality. They understand how traditional institutions and governments extract value from working people. All of us believe in the sovereignty of individuals and the power of decentralized communities. This is why Bitcoin and Costa Rica are made for each other.” Govinda no longer sounds like a shaman; he now speaks like the leader of a movement. He probably has a little bit of each. Either way, both he and Richard are very clear in their motivations. “We’re not just doing this because we love Bitcoin. We’re doing this because we want to change the world. But to do that, it’s important that we also change inwardly. It’s a fusion between our spiritual quest, a new philosophy of life and a technology that facilitates it. There is no way we can sustainably raise human consciousness unless we liberate the way we store and transfer value between us,” Richard concludes. When people cannot control the soundness and ownership of their money, their vital energy can be abused and manipulated. This also applies to sovereign countries when they see their foreign currency reserves being diluted by the issuers of those fiat currencies. With Bitcoin, individuals and nation-states become truly sovereign entities, with the ability to protect their wealth from potential confiscation. “Bitcoin protects your energy in a way that no one can mess with,” Govinda enthuses. “Before Bitcoin, we were truly free only in our souls. We have energy sovereignty as spiritual beings, but on a physical level we were completely controlled by the elites, their politicians and their armies. Now Bitcoin has extended our freedom to the physical world — that changes everything! It also enables sovereignty, celebration of life and healing on a global scale.” “Bitcoin is the liberation of humanity from ancestral abuse.” Yoga, meditation and nature are fundamental axes of the project’s philosophy. There, Bitcoin is understood as a tool to lower people’s time preference and raise human consciousness. A Circular Economy Network In the case of Bitcoin Jungle, as in all other Bitcoin Circular Economies, their first contact at the beginning of the project was with the friends of Bitcoin Beach. In addition to that first inspiring trip to El Salvador and the opportunity to use their wallet code, both teams have a permanent communication channel to collaborate and share ideas. On the educational side, Bitcoin Jungle has also received support from My First Bitcoin. “We have a very good relationship with Mike and the Bitcoin Beach team. We are also very grateful to Napoleon from My First Bitcoin,” Richard punctuates his mental list of collaborations. “I myself dictate his materials to the kids here at school. Whenever we meet at any conference we try to organize a dinner between the circular economies. Thankfully, that table is getting bigger and bigger every time. Bitcoin is very powerful.” The Bitcoin Circular Economies play a unique role in the ecosystem because they demonstrate on a small scale how global Bitcoin adoption can benefit people and communities with different needs. “I’m a big fan of the Bitcoin Ekasi team,” Richard sums up, in a demonstration of the strength that traces the invisible thread. “How a poor village in South Africa has been able to create a Bitcoin Circular Economy that is becoming known around the world.” Richard even dreams of the day when we have conferences totally dedicated to studying these early adopter case studies. “I would love to see a conference totally dedicated to Bitcoin Circular Economies. With projects from all over the world coming together to share their experiences, their stories and their lessons learned.” What role will a Bitcoin Circular Economy play in the future? Will these early communities be the birth of a new way of organizing society? Will we see an exponential growth of pari passu BCEs with the mass adoption of Bitcoin? If today’s overcrowded cities continue their decline along with fiat governments drowning in debt, is it possible that a decentralized way of living could offer a better quality of life, greater community livelihood and deeper connection with nature? For years, the Bitcoin community has predicted the emergence of luxurious Bitcoin citadels in the future. Can a Bitcoin Circular Economy be a more heterogeneous and inclusive alternative to those citadels? “To me, a circular economy is the lifeblood of Bitcoin, even if many bitcoiners haven’t yet realized it. Bitcoin strongholds will be elitist places, designed from the top down and only for a lucky few. The great thing about a Bitcoin circular economy is that we have not been designed out of luxury,” Richard expounds. “We have simply emerged from social, not-for-profit efforts, with the goal of improving the lives of everyone in our communities.” Gabriel Kurman is a blockchain entrepreneur with more than a decade of corporate finance experience. A co-founder of several projects such as Rootstock, La Bitcoineta and Blockchain4Humanity, he dedicates his life to Bitcoin innovation and education. His first book, Bitcoin Circular Economies, is out this month by Bitcoin Magazine Books. Bitcoin Jungle can be found on IG, or via www.bitcoinjungle.app and the festival website. Donations are welcome via: www.bitcoinjungle.app/donate BM Big Reads are weekly, in-depth articles on some current topic relevant to Bitcoin and Bitcoiners. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine. If you have a submission you think fits the model, feel free to reach out at editor[at]bitcoinmagazine.com. Discover more in Bitcoin Circular Economies This excerpt is just the beginning. Dive deeper into how Bitcoin is transforming communities worldwide in Bitcoin Circular Economies. The e-book is available now, and the paperback is open for pre-order for only $21 for a limited time. Order your copy here This post Freedom of Mind and Freedom of Money: Inside Costa Rica’s Growing Bitcoin Circular Economy first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Gabriel Kurman.

[Bitcoin Magazine](https://bitcoinmagazine.com)
![](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Big-Read-circular-economy-bitcoin-beach-Costa-Rica.jpg)
[Freedom of Mind and Freedom of Money: Inside Costa Rica’s Growing Bitcoin Circular Economy](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/bitcoin-circular-economy-awake-costa-rica)

The embryo of each Bitcoin Circular Economy is unique.

The purposes of Bitcoin Circular Economies are diverse and, as they grow, the projects develop their own identity: education, P2P, payments, wallets etc. The quests of their protagonists often shape the origin of each, with characteristics and needs that define them. The founders, who decide to pursue this social, technological and economic adventure, define the spirit of the project. The Bitcoin Jungle project was born in the [heart of the Costa Rican jungle](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/print/bitcoin-jungle-lightning-to-fiat-payments), where a vibrant community of expatriates and digital nomads from all over the world is trying to develop a more conscious way of living in harmony with nature.

Two men lit the spark that gave birth to Bitcoin Jungle. Over time, others joined the fire, but two were the energies that aligned to start this project. One a developer and serial entrepreneur; the other a journalist, retired teacher and democracy activist.

Both shared two deeply rooted beliefs in their hearts. First, Costa Rica is the best place in the world to live. Second, Bitcoin is an enlightening technology that can lead humanity to a more peaceful and evolved lifestyle.

Richard Scotford lived in Hong Kong for more than 20 years. He worked as a teacher and _freelance_ reporter for various media outlets, always as a political analyst. Richard witnessed firsthand the peaceful protests that began there in 2014 with the “Umbrella Movement,” which later became a symbol of resistance. Without mincing words, Richard supported Hong Kong’s democratic struggle against the Chinese Communist Party, which imposed an election system where the people could only choose among candidates selected by the party. Through his articles, Richard became part of Hong Kong’s political scene, and when his friends and colleagues began to be imprisoned, he decided it was time to take a new direction in life.

At the time, Richard knew nothing about Bitcoin and admits that he crossed off the list of all the mistakes that cryptocurrency users usually make before coming into Bitcoin.

> “We were scammed, we lost money until mid-2018 when we started to understand the differences between Bitcoin and the other cryptocurrencies.”

The realization about Bitcoin and the profound impact it could have on the world came at a very special time in the lives of Richard and his wife.

“We were in the middle-class trap, where we had everything we needed. All we could do was have more or better stuff. A better car, a fancier boat, a bigger house or join a better club. I call it a trap because there was nothing extra to own. It was clear that our happiness was not going to change by having more or better things. We wanted to do something radically different and that’s how we ended up in Costa Rica.”

At first, the couple explored the diverse climates and landscapes of the country. They found many similarities with the jungles of Hong Kong, enjoyed the volcanic beaches of the Pacific Ocean as well as those of the Caribbean. It was not easy to impress the new visitors, who knew the Asian beaches by heart. It wasn’t until Christmas 2019 when Richard would find a new meaning to his purpose in Costa Rica.

“We participated in an ayahuasca ceremony in the jungle. Suddenly, three different ideas connected in my mind. On the one hand, I felt a call to dive deep into jungle medicine, which is central to Costa Rican culture. On the other hand, all the ideas I had about Bitcoin connected. At the time, I was precisely falling down the rabbit hole, studying and learning as much as possible.”

> “It all connected with conversations about the best way to school our daughter.”

“It all came together: I was a teacher in Hong Kong, so naturally it came up for me to get involved with a local elementary school. Then the idea of building our own secondary school in 2020 would come up.”

Before long, the dream of opening his own school came to life. “I told my wife: ‘We are going to create the first school in Costa Rica that accepts bitcoin. And we’re going to teach their kids and our kids about Bitcoin.’ The only thing I could think of was to send out a tweet to the Bitcoin community that said, ‘We are a school in Costa Rica, we want to accept Bitcoin. How can we do it?’”

Many people responded to Richard’s request for help, including Nicholas Burtey, co-founder of Galoy and the [Bitcoin Beach wallet](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/bitcoin-beach-wallet-renamed-to-blink), currently called [Blink](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/bitcoin-beach-wallet-renamed-to-blink). Nicholas suggested that the best way to start accepting small payments was through a Bitcoin Lightning wallet and offered to help. He encouraged them to create a fork of their own wallet, based on the open source repository of the Bitcoin Beach wallet.

That was the first moment Richard realized he wasn’t alone. “That’s where things started to take shape. We wanted to develop our own wallet to simplify payments at school, and at the same time also facilitate Bitcoin adoption in Uvita, the town we chose to live in. The problem was that we didn’t have the technical skills needed to fork the Galoy repository and build it.”

The universe manages to cross the paths of people who need each other. Just when Richard was stymied by his lack of technical skills to launch a local version of the wallet tailored to Uvita’s needs, he met Lee Salminen, a software engineer and serial entrepreneur from Boulder, Colorado. Lee is a cheerful, positive person who sees opportunity in every challenge. The combination of his technical skills, his passion for Bitcoin and his purpose in life made him the perfect candidate to start a Bitcoin Circular Economy. Richard and Lee fit together like pieces of a puzzle.”

“Lee is another core founder of Bitcoin Jungle. He was able to bring the project to life. He copied Galoy’s wallet over a weekend, without any support. Even the guys at Galoy couldn’t believe we had done it so fast,” Richard recalls.

> “Bitcoin is a tool to change the world, to raise the awareness of humanity.”

Just at that time, the first edition of the [Adopting Bitcoin conference](https://adoptingbitcoin.org/) was taking place in El Salvador. Richard traveled to the neighboring country, while Lee stayed in Costa Rica working on the wallet. “Going on that trip to El Salvador was eye-opening. No one knew who I was. Just a simple English guy walking down the halls, trying to make friends, saying, ‘Hi, we want to do something like Bitcoin Beach in Costa Rica — can you help us?'”

The Sats Were Already in This Circular Economy
----------------------------------------------

Seen from the outside, Bitcoin Jungle’s approach seemed impossible. Copying the source code of a wallet over a weekend, without technical support from the original developers, was a huge challenge. Then launching an adoption campaign without a significant amount of sats to donate and start the process.

However, Richard knew that a Bitcoin Circular Economy in Costa Rica had potential for one simple reason. “The sats were already there! I knew Costa Rica was different. There were a lot of people around me who owned bitcoin. It was full of expats. All we needed was to create the payment rails to get them moving. The money was already here, we just needed places to spend it.” Richard doesn’t beat around the bush and gets straight to the point because he feels he has a message to share:

> “You have to know your community. Understand and provide the services they need. It’s important to learn from other circular economies, but many times the keys to success are in the differences.”

When Richard returned from El Salvador, Lee already had his wallet working. The excitement within the volcanoes of the Costa Rican jungle was beginning to stir the first tremors.

The Circular Economy Plan: Start Small
--------------------------------------

From the beginning, the founders of Bitcoin Jungle decided to keep the efforts concentrated in a relatively small area called The Golden Triangle, demarcated by the towns of Dominical, Uvita and Tinamaste. Instead of spreading the efforts throughout the country, they decided to focus on this particular region, characterized by spiritual seekers, surfers and people with a deep connection to nature.

“Although Bitcoin Jungle is spilling all over Costa Rica, in the beginning we had no plans to go out massively and try to adopt the whole country. It has always been about keeping it small, local, within our personal connections. The area between Dominical, Uvita and Tinamaste has a lot of healers, natural medicine practitioners and alternative people. It has this unique energy that is hard to explain, but easy to feel. It is a very large area, full of foreigners, who receive income from their countries and need to spend it in Costa Rica.”

Govinda wears yoga attire and whispers in a calm voice, which conveys the vibe of much of this community of foreigners who chose Costa Rica as their new home. Govinda is another key member of Bitcoin Jungle: He runs the holistic center [Awake, a sustainable hotel](https://www.awake.cr/bitcoin) with activities related to yoga and meditation.

Awake is also the place where many Bitcoin meetings are held, as well as training sessions on the Bitcoin Jungle wallet. This center is also the location where the [Nostrica conference](https://nostrica.com/) was held in 2023. This unique community has adopted Bitcoin as another tool to seek the elevation of human consciousness and harmony with nature. In pursuit


PacWest is the first of many small regional banks that will go under this year. Most will get bought by the big four in gov orchestrated sales. This has been the playbook since 2008.

> ![Bank Consolidation Then CBDC](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/05/banks-1.jpg)
>
> Bank run on every crypto bank then bank run on every "real" bank.
>
> — ODELL (@ODELL) [December 14, 2022](https://twitter.com/ODELL/status/1602838429447999491?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref=discreetlog.com)

Good morning.

It looks like PacWest will fail today. It will be both the fifth largest bank failure in US history and the sixth major bank to fail this year. It will likely get purchased by one of the big four banks in a government orchestrated sale.

**March 8th - Silvergate Bank
March 10th - Silicon Valley Bank
March 12th - Signature Bank
March 19th - Credit Suisse
May 1st - First Republic Bank
May 4th - PacWest Bank?**

PacWest is the first of many small regional banks that [will go under](https://www.discreetlog.com/banking-crisis/) this year. Most will get bought by the big four in gov orchestrated sales. This has been the playbook since 2008. Follow the incentives. Massive consolidation across the banking industry. PacWest gonna be a drop in the bucket compared to what comes next.

First, a hastened government led bank consolidation, then a public/private partnership with the remaining large banks to launch a surveilled and controlled digital currency network. We will be told it is more convenient. We will be told it is safer. We will be told it will prevent future bank runs. All of that is marketing bullshit. **The goal is greater control of money. The ability to choose how we spend it and how we save it. If you control the money - you control the people that use it.**

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![Bank Consolidation Then CBDC](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


> ![Money Without Trust](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/03/rdogs.webp)
>
> Bank run on every crypto bank then bank run on every "real" bank.
>
> — ODELL (@ODELL) [December 14, 2022](https://twitter.com/ODELL/status/1602838429447999491?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref=discreetlog.com)

The four main banks of bitcoin and “crypto” are Signature, Prime Trust, Silvergate, and Silicon Valley Bank. Prime Trust does not custody funds themselves but rather maintains deposit accounts at BMO Harris Bank, Cross River, Lexicon Bank, MVB Bank, and Signature Bank. Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank have already stopped withdrawals. **More banks will go down before the chaos stops. None of them have sufficient reserves to meet withdrawals.**

Bitcoin gives us all the ability to opt out of a system that has massive layers of counterparty risk built in, years of cheap money and broken incentives have layered risk on top of risk throughout the entire global economy. If you thought the FTX bank run was painful to watch, I have bad news for you: every major bank in the world is fractional reserve. **Bitcoin held in self custody is unique in its lack of counterparty risk, as global market chaos unwinds this will become much more obvious.**

The rules of bitcoin are extremely hard to change by design. Anyone can access the network directly without a trusted third party by using their own node. Owning more bitcoin does not give you more control over the network with all participants on equal footing.

> _Bitcoin is:
> \- money that is not controlled by a company or government
> \- money that can be spent or saved without permission
> \- money that is provably scarce and should increase in purchasing power with adoption_

**Bitcoin is money without trust.** Whether you are a nation state, corporation, or an individual, you can use bitcoin to spend or save without permission. Social media will accelerate the already deteriorating trust in our institutions and as this trust continues to crumble the value of trust minimized money will become obvious. **As adoption increases so should the purchasing power of bitcoin.**

> _A quick note on "stablecoins," such as USDC - it is important to remember that they rely on trusted custodians. They have the same risk as funds held directly in bank accounts with additional counterparty risk on top. The trusted custodians can be pressured by gov, exit scam, or caught up in fraud. Funds can and will be frozen at will. **This is a distinctly different trust model than bitcoin, which is a native bearer token that does not rely on any centralized entity or custodian.**_

Most bitcoin exchanges have exposure to these failing banks. Expect more chaos and confusion as this all unwinds. Withdraw any bitcoin to your own wallet ASAP.

Simple Self Custody Guide: [https://werunbtc.com/muun](https://t.co/J61rFmeovE?ref=discreetlog.com)
More Secure Cold Storage Guide: [https://werunbtc.com/coldcard](https://t.co/LMTDzJ86Ec?ref=discreetlog.com)

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![Money Without Trust](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


> ![Nostr: A Revolutionary Communication Protocol](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/04/nostr.webp)
>
> [@matt\_odell](https://twitter.com/MATT_ODELL?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref=discreetlog.com) don't you even dare not ask about nostr!
>
> — Kukks (Andrew Camilleri) (@MrKukks) [May 18, 2021](https://twitter.com/MrKukks/status/1394638825675177986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref=discreetlog.com)

Nostr first hit my radar spring 2021: created by fellow bitcoiner and friend, [fiatjaf](https://twitter.com/fiatjaf?ref=discreetlog.com), and [released](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr?ref=discreetlog.com) to the world as free open source software. I was fortunate to be able to host a [conversation with him on Citadel Dispatch](https://www.podpage.com/citadeldispatch/cd63-building-nostr-a-censorship-resistant-alternative-to-twitter-with-fiatjaf-jb55-and-mrkukks/?ref=discreetlog.com) in those early days, capturing that moment in history forever. Since then, the protocol has seen explosive viral organic growth as individuals around the world have contributed their time and energy to build out the protocol and the surrounding ecosystem due to the clear need for better communication tools.

_**nostr is to twitter as bitcoin is to paypal**_

As an intro to nostr, let us start with a metaphor:

_**twitter is paypal** - a centralized platform plagued by censorship but has the benefit of established network effects_

_**nostr is bitcoin** - an open protocol that is censorship resistant and robust but requires an organic adoption phase_

**Nostr is an open communication protocol that can be used to send messages across a distributed set of relays in a censorship resistant and robust way.
** - Anyone can run a relay.
 - Anyone can interact with the protocol.
 - Relays can choose which messages they want to relay.
 - Users are identified by a simple public private key pair that they can generate themselves.

Nostr is often compared to twitter since there are nostr clients that emulate twitter functionality and user interface but that is merely one application of the protocol. **Nostr is so much more than a mere twitter competitor.** Nostr clients and relays can transmit a wide variety of data and clients can choose how to display that information to users. The result is a revolution in communication with implications that are difficult for any of us to truly comprehend.

Similar to bitcoin, nostr is an open and permissionless protocol. **No person, company, or government controls it.** Anyone can iterate and build on top of nostr without permission. Together, bitcoin and nostr are incredibly complementary freedom tech tools: censorship resistant, permissionless, robust, and interoperable - money and speech protected by code and incentives, not laws.

As censorship throughout the world continues to escalate, freedom tech provides hope for individuals around the world who refuse to accept the status quo. This movement will succeed on the shoulders of those who choose to stand up and contribute. We will build our own path. A brighter path.

* * *

**My Nostr Public Key:** [npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx](https://primal.net/odell?ref=discreetlog.com)

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![Nostr: A Revolutionary Communication Protocol](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


> !['The Lightning Network' Does Not Exist](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/03/lightningnetwork.webp)
>
> The former seems to have found solid product market fit. Expect significant volume, adoption, and usage going forward.
>
> The latter's future remains to be seen. Dependence on Tor, which has had massive reliability issues, and lack of strong privacy guarantees put it at risk.
>
> — ODELL (@ODELL) [October 27, 2022](https://twitter.com/ODELL/status/1585633149815377922?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref=discreetlog.com)

**The Basics**

*   Lightning is a protocol that enables cheap and fast native bitcoin transactions.
*   At the core of the protocol is the ability for bitcoin users to create a payment channel with another user.
*   These payment channels enable users to make many bitcoin transactions between each other with only two on-chain bitcoin transactions: the channel open transaction and the channel close transaction.
*   Essentially lightning is a protocol for interoperable batched bitcoin transactions.
*   It is expected that on chain [bitcoin transaction fees will increase](https://www.discreetlog.com/utxos/) with adoption and the ability to easily batch transactions will save users significant money.
*   As these lightning transactions are processed, liquidity flows from one side of a channel to the other side, on chain transactions are signed by both parties but not broadcasted to update this balance.
*   Lightning is designed to be trust minimized, either party in a payment channel can close the channel at any time and their bitcoin will be settled on chain without trusting the other party.

**There is no 'Lightning Network'**

*   Many people refer to the aggregate of all lightning channels as 'The Lightning Network' but this is a false premise.
*   There are many lightning channels between many different users and funds can flow across interconnected channels as long as there is a route through peers.
*   If a lightning transaction requires multiple hops it will flow through multiple interconnected channels, adjusting the balance of all channels along the route, and paying lightning transaction fees that are set by each node on the route.

**Example:** You have a channel with Bob. Bob has a channel with Charlie. You can pay Charlie through your channel with Bob and Bob's channel with User C.

*   As a result, it is not guaranteed that every lightning user can pay every other lightning user, they must have a route of interconnected channels between sender and receiver.

**Lightning in Practice**

*   Lightning has already found product market fit and usage as an interconnected payment protocol between large professional custodians.
*   They are able to easily manage channels and liquidity between each other without trust using this interoperable protocol.
*   Lightning payments between large custodians are fast and easy. End users do not have to run their own node or manage their channels and liquidity. These payments rarely fail due to professional management of custodial nodes.
*   The tradeoff is one inherent to custodians and other trusted third parties. Custodial wallets can steal funds and compromise user privacy.

**Sovereign Lightning**

*   Trusted third parties are [security holes](https://nakamotoinstitute.org/trusted-third-parties/?ref=discreetlog.com).
*   Users must run their own node and manage their own channels in order to use lightning without trusting a third party. This remains the single largest friction point for sovereign lightning usage: the mental burden of actively running a lightning node and associated liquidity management.
*   Bitcoin development prioritizes node accessibility so cost to self host your own node is low but if a node is run at home or office, Tor or a VPN is recommended to mask your IP address: otherwise it is visible to the entire network and represents a privacy risk.
*   This privacy risk is heightened due to the potential for certain governments to go after sovereign lightning users and compel them to shutdown their nodes. If their IP Address is exposed they are easier to target.
*   Fortunately the tools to run and manage nodes continue to get easier but it is important to understand that this will always be a friction point when compared to custodial services.

**The Potential Fracture of Lightning**

*   Any lightning user can choose which users are allowed to open channels with them.
*   One potential is that professional custodians only peer with other professional custodians.
*   We already see nodes like those run by CashApp only have channels open with other regulated counterparties. This could be due to performance goals, liability reduction, or regulatory pressure.

[!['The Lightning Network' Does Not Exist](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/03/cashapp-2.webp)](https://mempool.space/lightning/node/02e1221434a21b8ce5818e92c6ec76301824dc87ed94b4628242e4b1f4a6ff445f?ref=discreetlog.com)

*   Fortunately some of their peers are connected to non-regulated parties so payments to and from sovereign lightning users are still successfully processed by CashApp but this may not always be the case going forward.

**Summary**

*   Many people refer to the aggregate of all lightning channels as 'The Lightning Network' but this is a false premise. There is no singular 'Lightning Network' but rather many payment channels between distinct peers, some connected with each other and some not.
*   Lightning as an interoperable payment protocol between professional custodians seems to have found solid product market fit. Expect significant volume, adoption, and usage going forward.
*   Lightning as a robust sovereign payment protocol has yet to be battle tested. Heavy reliance on Tor, which has had massive reliability issues, the friction of active liquidity management, significant on chain fee burden for small amounts, interactivity constraints on mobile, and lack of strong privacy guarantees put it at risk.

* * *

_If you have never used lightning before, use_ [_this guide_](https://werunbtc.com/phoenix?ref=discreetlog.com) _to get started on your phone._

* * *

**_If you found this post helpful support my work with_** [**_bitcoin_**](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com)**_._**

!['The Lightning Network' Does Not Exist](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


![Patriot Act 2.0](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/03/restrictact.webp)

The newly proposed RESTRICT ACT - is being advertised as a TikTok Ban, but is much broader than that, carries a $1M Fine and up to 20 years in prison! It is unconstitutional and would create massive legal restrictions on the open source movement and free speech throughout the internet.

The [Bill](https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3/f/3f2eaae6-09ad-49e1-b254-46289cf20cca/843D73B1823EA0D4122B4365262410D6.restrict-act-final-text.pdf?ref=discreetlog.com) was proposed by: Senator Warner, Senator Thune, Senator Baldwin, Senator Fischer, Senator Manchin, Senator Moran, Senator Bennet, Senator Sullivan, Senator Gillibrand, Senator Collins, Senator Heinrich, and Senator Romney. It has broad support across Senators of both parties.

Corrupt politicians will not protect us. They are part of the problem. We must build, support, and learn how to use censorship resistant tools in order to defend our natural rights.

> The RESTRICT Act, introduced by Senators Warner and Thune, aims to block or disrupt transactions and financial holdings involving foreign adversaries that pose risks to national security. Although the primary targets of this legislation are companies like Tik-Tok, the language of the bill could potentially be used to block or disrupt cryptocurrency transactions and, in extreme cases, block Americans’ access to open source tools or protocols like Bitcoin.

> The Act creates a redundant regime paralleling OFAC without clear justification, it significantly limits the ability for injured parties to challenge actions raising due process concerns, and unlike OFAC it lacks any carve-out for protected speech. [COINCENTER ON THE RESTRICT ACT](https://www.coincenter.org/the-restrict-act-creates-blanket-authority-with-few-checks-to-ban-just-about-anything-linked-to-a-foreign-adversary/?ref=discreetlog.com)

[**Full Text of Bill**](https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3/f/3f2eaae6-09ad-49e1-b254-46289cf20cca/843D73B1823EA0D4122B4365262410D6.restrict-act-final-text.pdf?ref=discreetlog.com)

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![Patriot Act 2.0](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


![KYC Bitcoin: Individuals are on Lists](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/02/binancekycleak.webp)

**_What is KYC/AML?_**

*   The acronym stands for Know Your Customer / Anti Money Laundering.
*   In practice it stands for the surveillance measures companies are often compelled to take against their customers by financial regulators.
*   Methods differ but often include: Passport Scans, Driver License Uploads, Social Security Numbers, Home Address, Phone Number, Face Scans.
*   Bitcoin companies will also store all withdrawal and deposit addresses which can then be used to track bitcoin transactions on the bitcoin block chain.
*   This data is then stored and shared. Regulations often require companies to hold this information for a set number of years but in practice users should assume this data will be held indefinitely. Data is often stored insecurely, which results in frequent [hacks and leaks](https://www.newsweek.com/binance-hack-telegram-kyc-data-extortion-changpeng-zhao-cryptocurrency-bitcoin-1452989?ref=discreetlog.com).
*   KYC/AML data collection puts all honest users at risk of theft, extortion, and persecution while being ineffective at stopping crime. Criminals often use [counterfeit, bought, or stolen](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/10/19/for-200-you-can-trade-crypto-with-a-fake-id/?ref=discreetlog.com) credentials to get around the requirements. Criminals can buy "verified" accounts for as [little as $200](https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/10/19/for-200-you-can-trade-crypto-with-a-fake-id/?ref=discreetlog.com). Furthermore, billions of people are excluded from financial services as a result of KYC/AML requirements.

During the early days of bitcoin most services did not require this sensitive user data, but as adoption increased so did the surveillance measures. At this point, **most large bitcoin companies are collecting and storing massive lists of bitcoiners, our sensitive personal information, and our transaction history.**

**Lists of Bitcoiners**

KYC/AML policies are a direct attack on bitcoiners. Lists of bitcoiners and our transaction history will inevitably be used against us.

Once you are on a list with your bitcoin transaction history that record will always exist. Generally speaking, tracking bitcoin is based on probability analysis of ownership change. Surveillance firms use various heuristics to determine if you are sending bitcoin to yourself or if ownership is actually changing hands.  You can obtain better privacy going forward by using collaborative transactions such as coinjoin to break this probability analysis.

Fortunately, you can buy bitcoin without providing intimate personal information. Tools such as [peach](https://peachbitcoin.com/?ref=discreetlog.com), [hodlhodl](https://hodlhodl.com/?ref=discreetlog.com), [robosats](https://learn.robosats.com/?ref=discreetlog.com), [azteco](https://azte.co/?ref=discreetlog.com) and [bisq](https://bisq.network/?ref=discreetlog.com) help; mining is also a solid option: anyone can plug a miner into power and internet and earn bitcoin by mining privately.

You can also earn bitcoin by providing goods and/or services that can be purchased with bitcoin. Long term, circular economies will mitigate this threat: most people will not buy bitcoin - they will earn bitcoin - most people will not sell bitcoin - they will spend bitcoin.

**There is no such thing as KYC or No KYC bitcoin, there are bitcoiners on lists and those that are not on lists.**

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![KYC Bitcoin: Individuals are on Lists](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)


Bitcoin Magazine Bitcoin Price Drops Below $112,000 As Metaplanet Announces To Buy $11.7M Worth Of Bitcoin Bitcoin’s price retreated below $112,000 as Japan’s Metaplanet announced the purchase of an additional 103 BTC worth approximately $11.7 million, bringing its total holdings to 18,991 BTC valued at roughly $2.2 billion. The announcement comes as FTSE Russell confirmed Metaplanet’s inclusion in the FTSE Japan Index, upgrading the company from small-cap to mid-cap status in its September 2025 semi-annual review. The index inclusion, set to take effect after market close on September 19, marks a significant milestone for corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies. “Another important milestone on our journey as Japan’s leading Bitcoin treasury company,” Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich wrote on X (formerly Twitter). The company’s aggressive Bitcoin acquisition strategy aims to accumulate 210,000 BTC. The latest purchase was partially funded through the exercise of 49,000 stock acquisition rights between August 18-22, which added 4.9 million shares to the company’s total outstanding shares, now reaching 722 million. This financing mechanism, while diluting existing shareholders, enables continued Bitcoin accumulation without depleting cash reserves. Metaplanet’s inclusion in the FTSE Japan Index creates a regulated route for BTC exposure and paves the way for other Bitcoin-forward companies to join major benchmarks. Passive flows into the FTSE indices could channel institutional capital into Metaplanet, offering indirect Bitcoin exposure. The company’s transformation from a traditional hotel group to Asia’s most active Bitcoin treasury firm reflects a broader trend of corporate Bitcoin adoption. In the past month alone, five public companies have announced significant Bitcoin treasury initiatives, including Ming Shing Group’s $483 million purchase and KindlyMD’s $679 million acquisition. The integration of Bitcoin-heavy companies into traditional equity indices presents new challenges for institutional investors. While passive inflows through index inclusion could boost liquidity and long-term stability, large movements in Bitcoin prices could create unexpected volatility for passive investors. Eric Trump, who joined Metaplanet as a strategic adviser in March, is expected to attend the company’s next shareholder meeting in Tokyo in September. His involvement highlights the growing intersection between traditional finance and Bitcoin treasury strategies. As more corporations adopt Bitcoin treasury strategies, the line between traditional equity investments and Bitcoin exposure continues to blur. Metaplanet’s FTSE inclusion may serve as a template for other companies looking to balance Bitcoin treasury operations with mainstream market participation. The trend of corporate Bitcoin adoption shows no signs of slowing, with analysts expecting more companies to announce Bitcoin treasury initiatives in the coming months. This growing institutional acceptance, coupled with innovative financing structures, suggests that corporate Bitcoin holdings could become an increasingly significant factor in both equity and Bitcoin markets. This post Bitcoin Price Drops Below $112,000 As Metaplanet Announces To Buy $11.7M Worth Of Bitcoin first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Vivek Sen.

[Bitcoin Magazine](https://bitcoinmagazine.com)
![](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Metaplanet-Hits-New-All-Time-High-As-Bitcoin-Hits-Record-Price.jpg)
[Bitcoin Price Drops Below $112,000 As Metaplanet Announces To Buy $11.7M Worth Of Bitcoin](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/bitcoin-price-drops-below-112000-as-metaplanet-announces-to-buy-11-7m-worth-of-bitcoin)

[Bitcoin’s price](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/bitcoin-price) retreated below $112,000 as Japan’s [Metaplanet](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/tags/metaplanet) announced the [purchase](https://contents.xj-storage.jp/xcontents/33500/7239e443/dba5/4993/9b81/f848fb2c99f2/140120250824546395.pdf) of an additional 103 BTC worth approximately $11.7 million, bringing its total holdings to 18,991 BTC valued at roughly $2.2 billion.

The announcement comes as FTSE Russell confirmed [Metaplanet’s](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/tags/metaplanet) inclusion in the FTSE Japan Index, upgrading the company from small-cap to mid-cap status in its September 2025 semi-annual review. The index inclusion, set to take effect after market close on September 19, marks a significant milestone for corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies.

“Another important milestone on our journey as Japan’s leading Bitcoin treasury company,” Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich [wrote on X](https://x.com/gerovich/status/1959800012398796935) (formerly Twitter). The company’s aggressive Bitcoin acquisition strategy aims to accumulate 210,000 BTC.

The latest purchase was partially [funded through](https://contents.xj-storage.jp/xcontents/33500/7239e443/dba5/4993/9b81/f848fb2c99f2/140120250824546395.pdf) the exercise of 49,000 stock acquisition rights between August 18-22, which added 4.9 million shares to the company’s total outstanding shares, now reaching 722 million. This financing mechanism, while diluting existing shareholders, enables continued Bitcoin accumulation without depleting cash reserves.

[Metaplanet’s](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/tags/metaplanet) inclusion in the FTSE Japan Index creates a regulated route for BTC exposure and paves the way for other Bitcoin-forward companies to join major benchmarks. Passive flows into the FTSE indices could channel institutional capital into Metaplanet, offering indirect Bitcoin exposure.

The company’s transformation from a traditional hotel group to Asia’s most active Bitcoin treasury firm reflects a broader trend of corporate Bitcoin adoption. In the past month alone, five public companies have announced significant Bitcoin treasury initiatives, including Ming Shing Group’s $483 million purchase and KindlyMD’s $679 million acquisition.

The integration of Bitcoin-heavy companies into traditional equity indices presents new challenges for institutional investors. While passive inflows through index inclusion could boost liquidity and long-term stability, large movements in Bitcoin prices could create unexpected volatility for passive investors.

Eric Trump, who joined [Metaplanet](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/tags/metaplanet) as a strategic adviser in March, is expected to attend the company’s next shareholder meeting in Tokyo in September. His involvement highlights the growing intersection between traditional finance and Bitcoin treasury strategies.

As more corporations adopt Bitcoin treasury strategies, the line between traditional equity investments and Bitcoin exposure continues to blur. Metaplanet’s FTSE inclusion may serve as a template for other companies looking to balance Bitcoin treasury operations with mainstream market participation.

The trend of corporate Bitcoin adoption shows no signs of slowing, with analysts expecting more companies to announce Bitcoin treasury initiatives in the coming months. This growing institutional acceptance, coupled with innovative financing structures, suggests that corporate Bitcoin holdings could become an increasingly significant factor in both equity and Bitcoin markets.

This post [Bitcoin Price Drops Below $112,000 As Metaplanet Announces To Buy $11.7M Worth Of Bitcoin](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/bitcoin-price-drops-below-112000-as-metaplanet-announces-to-buy-11-7m-worth-of-bitcoin) first appeared on [Bitcoin Magazine](https://bitcoinmagazine.com) and is written by [Vivek Sen](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/authors/vivek-sen-bitcoin).


How Activist NGOs Have Unintentionally STALLED Progress TOWARDS Ending Gas Flaring

The World Bank set an ambitious goal: eliminate nearly all gas flaring by 2030. Flaring, the burning of excess natural gas during oil extraction, is a major environmental problem, releasing millions of tons of CO2e (CO2 equivalents) in the form of methane and other toxic pollutants into the atmosphere annually. The problem is, flaring only burns 91.1% of the methane, so the other 8.9% goes unburnt directly into the atmosphere. This contributes to climate change significantly because methane is 84 times more warming over a 20 year period than CO2. In regions like the Middle East, flaring has been shown to cause more harm than previously thought, with recent studies revealing higher levels of toxic gases like benzene and sulfur dioxide (source: World Bank Global Gas Flaring Tracker, 2023). Despite the urgency, progress to end flaring has been slow. While there are many factors at play, but one of the most significant barrier is also the most overlooked: environmental NGOs themselves, specifically a small handful of the more ideologically-driven activist environmental NGOs. These organizations, while well-intentioned, have consistently criticized and undermined almost all efforts from outside commercial organizations to collaborate with oil and gas companies to reduce flaring. In this article, we’ll examine how this tendency to label such initiatives as “greenwashing,” their failure to offer viable alternatives, and their creation of an environment of fear have disincentivized other industries from partnering with oil companies to address this critical issue. The result? Flaring continues unabated and the environment, that these NGOs exist to be faithful stewards to, suffers. False positives: The harmful side-effect of calling something “greenwash” that’s not One counter-productive tendency of these NGOs has been their eagerness to label any and all collaboration with oil and gas companies as “greenwashing.” This term, which refers to superficial or misleading environmental claims, has become a catch-all critique for any effort to reduce flaring. These environmental NGO critiques are often reactive rather than analytical. For instance, when General Electric (GE) and Baker Hughes developed technologies to capture and utilize stranded gas, environmental groups like Sierra Club and Greenpeace accused them of “enabling continued fossil fuel extraction” without acknowledging the tangible emissions reductions these technologies achieved (source: Sierra Club Statement, 2020; Greenpeace International, 2020). By focusing on ideological purity rather than measurable outcomes, these NGOs have created a chilling effect, discouraging companies from pursuing innovative solutions to flaring. Incredibly, these criticisms have continued even when direct, measurable, and significant reduction of methane emissions has been the result. For example, when Crusoe Energy, a Bitcoin mining company, partnered with oil producers to convert flared gas into electricity, Jesse Simons, Deputy Director of Sierra Club’s Beyond Dirty Fuels Campaign, dismissed the initiative as “propping up the fossil fuel industry” (source: Sierra Club Press Release, 2022). Similarly, John Noël, Senior Climate Campaigner at Greenpeace USA, criticized ExxonMobil’s pilot project with Crusoe in the Permian Basin, calling it a “distraction from the urgent need to phase out fossil fuels entirely” (source: Greenpeace USA Statement, 2021). Criticism Without Solutions Another issue is the tendency of these NGOs to criticize without offering alternatives. For example, when BP partnered with Climeworks, a carbon capture company, to explore using captured methane for industrial purposes, and when Shell worked with Enerflex, a gas processing company to reduce flaring at their oilfields, Carroll Muffett, President of the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), accused both companies of using flaring reduction as a “public relations tool” (source: CIEL Press Release, 2021). Similarly, Friends of the Earth criticized waste-to-energy startup Ener-Core for “perpetuating the fossil fuel economy” without proposing a practical alternative for addressing stranded gas (source: Friends of the Earth Report, 2019). While it is an absolutely legitimate function of an environmental NGO to help the public understand when genuine greenwash is at play, the universal tendency across NGOs to label all collaborations with oil companies to end flaring as “greenwash” suggests strongly that there is neither analysis nor discrimination at play here on the part of these environmental NGOs, rather guilty verdict by virtue of the fact one would deign to partner with an oil company. Well, if outside organizations cannot partner with oil companies to deal with methane emissions, oil companies will continue with their own solution: flaring. The environment deserves better service than that. This pattern of criticism without constructive solutions is not only unhelpful but counterproductive. Flaring is a complex problem that requires immediate action. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that oil will still account for 22% of global energy demand in 2050, even in a net-zero scenario (source: IEA Net Zero by 2050 Report, 2021). Given this reality, the choice is not between oil production and no oil production—it is between flaring/venting and utilizing the gas in a way that reduces emissions. By dismissing efforts to address flaring without offering viable alternatives, these NGOs have effectively pushed the industry toward the most environmentally harmful option: continued flaring. How an Environment of Fear Disincentivizes Collaboration Perhaps the most counterproductive consequence of these NGOs’ actions is the environment of fear they have created. Companies that might otherwise partner with oil and gas producers to reduce flaring are often deterred by the risk of reputational damage. For example, renewable energy developers like NextEra Energy and Ørsted have considered using stranded gas for power generation but faced backlash from groups like 350.org and Oil Change International. These organizations accused NextEra of “betraying its renewable energy mission” and Ørsted of “legitimizing the fossil fuel industry” (source: 350.org Press Release, 2021; Oil Change International Report, 2021). This environment of fear has stifled innovation and collaboration. Waste-to-energy startups, renewable energy developers, and even technology giants like GE and Baker Hughes have been reluctant to engage with oil and gas companies, fearing the wrath of activist NGOs. The result is a missed opportunity to reduce emissions and accelerate the transition to a cleaner energy future. Bitcoin Mining: A Pragmatic Exception In this context, Bitcoin mining has emerged as a rare exception. Companies like Crusoe Energy and Upstream Data have been willing to partner with oil producers to convert flared gas into electricity, reducing emissions and generating economic value. These initiatives have been praised by the World Economic Forum for their tangible impact on flaring reduction, even as they face criticism from some NGOs. Crusoe’s projects in North Dakota and Wyoming have reduced flaring by over 90% at partnered sites (source: Crusoe Energy Case Studies, 2023). Similarly, Upstream Data’s operations in Canada have prevented millions of tons of CO2-equivalent emissions annually (source: Upstream Data Reports, 2022). Bitcoin mining’s success in addressing flaring highlights the importance of focusing on outcomes over ideology. NGOs like Sierra Club and Greenpeace were highly criticized of these partnerships at their inception, but have not acknowledged the measurable emissions reductions they ended up achieving. Analysis before ideology For us to have any hope of working collaboratively to end flaring, it’s critical for enviromental NGOs to step up and stop crying “greenwash” without analysis, as has been their tendency, to the detriment of the environment and collaborative action. The fight against flaring is too important to be derailed by ideological purity, and there is a phrase in the environmental movement that they would do well to remember “the perfect is the enemy of the good”. While the intentions of activist NGOs are good, good intentions divorsed from nuanced thinking can and has been counterproductive to the very environmental progress they only exist to create. Their reactive criticism, lack of viable alternatives, and creation of an environment of fear have hindered progress on this critical issue. To truly address flaring, we need a new approach—one that prioritizes measurable outcomes and encourages collaboration. These critiques, while well-intentioned, are misguided. By discouraging collaboration with oil companies, these NGOs inadvertently push the industry to deal with methane emissions in the most environmentally harmful way: flaring or venting. Continued inaction is simply not an option. It’s time for environmental organizations to stop criticicing every imperfect effort to move forward, and get their own house in order. In practical terms, this means: Properly evaluating whether collaborations are greenwash, or whether they can make a measurable difference Learning to work alongside commercial operations to better understand their motivations and strategies before simply criticizing them Taking time to do their own research, including engaging with experts in the domain (something that has been conspicuous by its absent in NGOs criticisms of Bitcoin mining and other industries) Take responsibility for the fact that they have the power to aid environmental progress, but equally the power to hinder progress through criticizing they may not fully understand and which may in fact be a solution, or part of the solution. Free themselves from the trap of overzealously declaring “greenwashing” even when it’s a false positive, and focus on what really matters: working collaboratively to reduce emissions and protecting the environment.

The World Bank set an ambitious goal: eliminate nearly [all gas flaring by 2030](https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/zero-routine-flaring-by-2030). Flaring, the burning of excess natural gas during oil extraction, is a [major environmental problem](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63051458), releasing millions of tons of CO2e (CO2 equivalents) in the form of methane and other toxic pollutants into the atmosphere annually. The problem is, flaring only burns 91.1% of the methane, so the other 8.9% goes unburnt directly into the atmosphere. This contributes to climate change significantly because methane is [84 times more warming](https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/speech/methane-action-tackling-warming-planet) over a 20 year period than CO2.

![](https://batcoinz.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Screen-Shot-2025-01-28-at-9.59.33-AM-1024x679.png)

In regions like the Middle East, flaring has been shown to cause more harm than previously thought, with recent studies revealing [higher levels of toxic gases](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67522413) like benzene and sulfur dioxide (source: _World Bank Global Gas Flaring Tracker, 2023_). Despite the urgency, progress to end flaring has been slow. While there are many factors at play, but one of the most significant barrier is also the most overlooked: environmental NGOs themselves, specifically a small handful of the more ideologically-driven activist environmental NGOs.

These organizations, while well-intentioned, have consistently criticized and undermined almost all efforts from outside commercial organizations to collaborate with oil and gas companies to reduce flaring. In this article, we’ll examine how this tendency to label such initiatives as “greenwashing,” their failure to offer viable alternatives, and their creation of an environment of fear have disincentivized other industries from partnering with oil companies to address this critical issue.

The result? Flaring continues unabated and the environment, that these NGOs exist to be faithful stewards to, suffers.

* * *

### False positives: **The harmful side-effect of calling something “greenwash” that’s not**

One counter-productive tendency of these NGOs has been their eagerness to label any and all collaboration with oil and gas companies as “greenwashing.” This term, which refers to superficial or misleading environmental claims, has become a catch-all critique for any effort to reduce flaring.

These environmental NGO critiques are often reactive rather than analytical. For instance, when General Electric (GE) and Baker Hughes developed technologies to capture and utilize stranded gas, environmental groups like Sierra Club and Greenpeace accused them of “enabling continued fossil fuel extraction” without acknowledging the tangible emissions reductions these technologies achieved (source: _Sierra Club Statement, 2020_; _Greenpeace International, 2020_). By focusing on ideological purity rather than measurable outcomes, these NGOs have created a chilling effect, discouraging companies from pursuing innovative solutions to flaring.

Incredibly, these criticisms have continued even when direct, measurable, and significant reduction of methane emissions has been the result. For example, when Crusoe Energy, a Bitcoin mining company, partnered with oil producers to convert flared gas into electricity, Jesse Simons, Deputy Director of Sierra Club’s Beyond Dirty Fuels Campaign, dismissed the initiative as “propping up the fossil fuel industry” (source: _Sierra Club Press Release, 2022_). Similarly, John Noël, Senior Climate Campaigner at Greenpeace USA, criticized ExxonMobil’s pilot project with Crusoe in the Permian Basin, calling it a “distraction from the urgent need to phase out fossil fuels entirely” (source: _Greenpeace USA Statement, 2021_).

* * *

### **Criticism Without Solutions**

Another issue is the tendency of these NGOs to criticize without offering alternatives. For example, when BP partnered with Climeworks, a carbon capture company, to explore using captured methane for industrial purposes, and when Shell worked with Enerflex, a gas processing company to reduce flaring at their oilfields, Carroll Muffett, President of the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), accused both companies of using flaring reduction as a “public relations tool” (source: _CIEL Press Release, 2021_). Similarly, Friends of the Earth criticized waste-to-energy startup Ener-Core for “perpetuating the fossil fuel economy” without proposing a practical alternative for addressing stranded gas (source: _Friends of the Earth Report, 2019_).

While it is an absolutely legitimate function of an environmental NGO to help the public understand when genuine greenwash is at play, the universal tendency across NGOs to label all collaborations with oil companies to end flaring as “greenwash” suggests strongly that there is neither analysis nor discrimination at play here on the part of these environmental NGOs, rather guilty verdict by virtue of the fact one would deign to partner with an oil company. Well, if outside organizations cannot partner with oil companies to deal with methane emissions, oil companies will continue with their own solution: flaring. The environment deserves better service than that.

This pattern of criticism without constructive solutions is not only unhelpful but counterproductive. Flaring is a complex problem that requires immediate action. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that oil will still account for 22% of global energy demand in 2050, even in a net-zero scenario (source: _IEA Net Zero by 2050 Report, 2021_). Given this reality, the choice is not between oil production and no oil production—it is between flaring/venting and utilizing the gas in a way that reduces emissions. By dismissing efforts to address flaring without offering viable alternatives, these NGOs have effectively pushed the industry toward the most environmentally harmful option: continued flaring.

* * *

### **How an Environment of Fear Disincentivizes Collaboration**

Perhaps the most counterproductive consequence of these NGOs’ actions is the environment of fear they have created. Companies that might otherwise partner with oil and gas producers to reduce flaring are often deterred by the risk of reputational damage. For example, renewable energy developers like NextEra Energy and Ørsted have considered using stranded gas for power generation but faced backlash from groups like 350.org and Oil Change International. These organizations accused NextEra of “betraying its renewable energy mission” and Ørsted of “legitimizing the fossil fuel industry” (source: _350.org Press Release, 2021_; _Oil Change International Report, 2021_).

This environment of fear has stifled innovation and collaboration. Waste-to-energy startups, renewable energy developers, and even technology giants like GE and Baker Hughes have been reluctant to engage with oil and gas companies, fearing the wrath of activist NGOs. The result is a missed opportunity to reduce emissions and accelerate the transition to a cleaner energy future.

* * *

### **Bitcoin Mining: A Pragmatic Exception**

In this context, Bitcoin mining has emerged as a rare exception. Companies like Crusoe Energy and Upstream Data have been willing to partner with oil producers to convert flared gas into electricity, reducing emissions and generating economic value. These initiatives have been [praised by the World Economic Forum](https://www.weforum.org/videos/this-start-up-catches-waste-methane-to-power-data-centres/) for their tangible impact on flaring reduction, even as they face criticism from some NGOs. Crusoe’s projects in North Dakota and Wyoming have reduced flaring by over 90% at partnered sites (source: _Crusoe Energy Case Studies, 2023_). Similarly, Upstream Data’s operations in Canada have prevented millions of tons of CO2-equivalent emissions annually (source: _Upstream Data Reports, 2022_).

Bitcoin mining’s success in addressing flaring highlights the importance of focusing on outcomes over ideology. NGOs like Sierra Club and Greenpeace were highly criticized of these partnerships at their inception, but have not acknowledged the measurable emissions reductions they ended up achieving.

* * *

### **Analysis before ideology**

For us to have any hope of working collaboratively to end flaring, it’s critical for enviromental NGOs to step up and stop crying “greenwash” without analysis, as has been their tendency, to the detriment of the environment and collaborative action. The fight against flaring is too important to be derailed by ideological purity, and there is a phrase in the environmental movement that they would do well to remember “the perfect is the enemy of the good”.

While the intentions of activist NGOs are good, good intentions divorsed from nuanced thinking can and has been counterproductive to the very environmental progress they only exist to create. Their reactive criticism, lack of viable alternatives, and creation of an environment of fear have hindered progress on this critical issue. To truly address flaring, we need a new approach—one that prioritizes measurable outcomes and encourages collaboration.

These critiques, while well-intentioned, are misguided. By discouraging collaboration with oil companies, these NGOs inadvertently push the industry to deal with methane emissions in the most environmentally harmful way: flaring or venting.

Continued inaction is simply not an option. It’s time for environmental organizations to stop criticicing every imperfect effort to move forward, and get their own house in order. In practical terms, this means:

1.  Properly evaluating whether collaborations are greenwash, or whether they can make a measurable difference
2.  Learning to work alongside commercial operations to better understand their motivations and strategies before simply criticizing them
3.  Taki


There are going to be many more bank failures as this ponzi system unravels. Unlike 2008, we have the ability to opt out of these broken and corrupt institutions by using bitcoin.

![More Banks Will Fail](https://www.discreetlog.com/content/images/2023/05/bankfailures.jpg)

People forget Bear Stearns failed March 2008 - months of denial followed before the public realized how bad the situation was under the surface.

Similar happening now but much larger scale. They did not fix fundamental issues after 2008 - everything is more fragile.

The Fed preemptively bailed out every bank with their BTFP program and First Republic Bank still failed. The second largest bank failure in history.

There will be more failures. There will be more bailouts. Depositors will be "protected" by socializing losses across everyone.

Our President and mainstream financial pundits are currently pretending the banking crisis is over while most banks remain insolvent. There are going to be many more bank failures as this ponzi system unravels.

**Unlike 2008, we have the ability to opt out of these broken and corrupt institutions by using bitcoin.** Bitcoin [held in self custody](https://werunbtc.com/coldcard?ref=discreetlog.com) is unique in its lack of counterparty risk - you do not have to trust a bank or other centralized entity to hold it for you. Bitcoin is also incredibly difficult to change by design since it is not controlled by an individual, company, or government - the supply of dollars will inevitably be inflated to bailout these failing banks but bitcoin supply will remain unchanged. **I do not need to convince you that bitcoin provides value - these next few years will convince millions.**

* * *

_**If you found this post helpful support my work with [bitcoin](https://geyser.fund/project/citadel?ref=discreetlog.com).**_

![More Banks Will Fail](https://werunbtc.com/donate.png)